WILL GIVE 100 POINTS AND A BRAINLEIST i need an argumentative essay on the book "flowers for algernon." you can read it on spark notes so its shorter but here's the prompt.

Write a three (3) paragraph argumentative essay that responds to the following prompt:

Prompt: Does Charlie have the intellectual ability to understand the possible repercussions associated with the surgery he is about to undergo. Use two pieces of evidence from these reports to support your claim and acknowledge the counterclaim.

** Evidence should be focused on character development obtained through annotation.

Argumentative short response outline

I. Intro - level 1 thinking

Topic sentence - TAG (title, author, genre)
Brief summary of story
Thesis - introduce argument. Make a claim with reasons.

II. Body - level 2 thinking

Topic sentence
Quote evidence supporting the claim, using an in-text citation.
Explain how this evidence supports the argument.
Elaborate on the evidence or provide examples.
Quote second piece of evidence supporting the claim, using an in-text citation.
Explain how this evidence supports the argument.
Elaborate on the evidence or provide examples.
Closing sentence.

III. Conclusion - level 3 thinking

Counterclaim - state the other side of the argument.
Refute & rebuttal - provide a better reason why the original claim is stronger.
Closing sentence - possibly connecting to the world or lessons that can be learned.

I don’t know but I need brainless and  then I’ll do another giveaway for 100 points

Explanation:

WILL GIVE 100 POINTS AND A BRAINLEIST

i need an argumentative essay on the book "flowers for algernon." you can read it on spark notes so its shorter but here's the prompt.

Write a three (3) paragraph argumentative essay that responds to the following prompt:

Prompt: Does Charlie have the intellectual ability to understand the possible repercussions associated with the surgery he is about to undergo. Use two pieces of evidence from these reports to support your claim and acknowledge the counterclaim.

** Evidence should be focused on character development obtained through annotation.

Argumentative short response outline

I. Intro - level 1 thinking

Topic sentence - TAG (title, author, genre)

Brief summary of story

Thesis - introduce argument. Make a claim with reasons.

II. Body - level 2 thinking

Topic sentence

Quote evidence supporting the claim, using an in-text citation.

Explain how this evidence supports the argument.

Elaborate on the evidence or provide examples.

Quote second piece of evidence supporting the claim, using an in-text citation.

Explain how this evidence supports the argument.

Elaborate on the evidence or provide examples.

Closing sentence.

III. Conclusion - level 3 thinking

Counterclaim - state the other side of the argument.

Refute & rebuttal - provide a better reason why the original claim is stronger.

Closing sentence - possibly connecting to the world or lessons that can be learned.