Hi, can someone please help me I will mark and 5 stars Explain the argument between the Federalists and
Antifederalists. How did the Bill of Rights solve this argument?

Explanation:

The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.

Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights. Federalists rejected the proposition that a bill of rights was needed.

tending to cause harm

buenas noches would be your answer