English, 11.11.2020 01:00 nathang444

Wordy writing can make it hard for readers to understand a writer’s point. Read this wordy student argument: It cannot be denied that Thor is the best and most superior superhero on account of being strong, being fast, and being able to control thunder and lightning.

Help the student make the argument more concise by removing unnecessary and distracting words. Rewrite the sentence above, cutting at least 7 words without changing the meaning.
Now, can you cut even more words than you did the first time? Write a second version of the sentence, cutting as many words as you can without changing the meaning.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 20:00

Ineed badly ! i got to get this done and i can't get it done tomorrow! 1. expand the meaning of each sentence by adding adjectives. (dinner cooks.) (clown chuckled.) (car raced.) (dancer spun.) (panthers growled.) (leaves fall.) (bread baked.) (lake glistened.) (ship glides.) 2. using the sentences above, expand the meaning by adding adverbs. 3. using any five of the sentences from #2, expand the meaning by adding a compound word to each sentence. 4. using any three of the sentences from #3, expand the meaning by adding a prepositional phrase to each sentence. 5. using any one of the sentences from #4, expand the meaning by adding a synonym to this sentence.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:10

Ivansanger rainsfordgeneral zaroffwhitneyadventurous hunter; calm and composed; considers himself a realist; new yorker; veteran of world war ia hunter; sympathetic to the plight of voiceless, defenseless animals; cautiouscossack; mute; formidable physical stature; wears a black uniform; used to whip prisoners for the great white czarcossack; aristocrat; has sharp, pointed teeth and red lips; devoid of humanity and emotion

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 08:00

What inferences can be made about odysseus based on his choice to stay and see the cyclops?

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 09:00

In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Wordy writing can make it hard for readers to understand a writer’s point. Read this wordy student...

Questions