SOMEONE PLEASE HELP PLEASE. WRITE 5 PARAGRAPH AND PLEASE DON'T GET IT FROM GOOGLE ILL BE GIVING BRAINEST. What is something that you are good at? Once you have something down, we are going to do an informative writing on it. Informative writing in my opinion is the easiest form of writing. You are just writing about something you know, so that makes it easy. Step one, Introduction- introduce what you are writing about (a skill or activity that you enjoy), why do you enjoy it? Why should others try it? What are three things you can do to get good at this skill or activity.
Body- What is the first thing you need to do to get good at this skill or activity. It usually goes in the order of importance, so the first on is usually the most important. It doesn't have to be though.. What is it, how do you practice it, and why it is important? These are some things you can write about in this paragraph. There is more, but that is a start.
Repeat for next two paragraphs.
Conclusion- What will we be able to do after reading your paper. How often and or for how long do we practice these activities? Any final words on the skill, its importance, or how it will improve our lives.
These are just examples of some things you can write about. But basically its, tell people what you will tell them about and why, tell them, then tell them what you just told them.

Do you like drawing?

Explanation:

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.

i'm going to go whit a