From the suppressed speech of Wamsutta (Frank B.) James Wampanoag Wamsutta James' speech inspired some Native Americans to boycott Thanksgiving and instead observe a National Day of Mourning. Keeler takes a slightly different approach. Which approach makes the most sense to you? Why?

Jacqueline Keeler's approach makes the most sense to me. (Find the reason below)

Explanation:

Jacqueline Keeler's stance on Thanksgiving makes more sense to me because she did not allow herself to become overly embittered by the damage the Pilgrims caused. Even though she celebrated Thanksgiving, it was not in the same light as the non-native Americans because this was a time of sober reflection for her. She believes that giving and sharing things on Thanksgiving day is proof that she did not allow the evil done by the Pilgrims to overshadow the good in her. It also helped her heal.

Wamsutta James' speech seems like that of a person who is still holding on to the hurt and damage. Nothing much can be done to reverse the evil that happened in the past. So, the best thing is to move on.

i remeber a bit, but i don't have the exact qoute.

it said that everytime you chopped a head off a new one grew in it's place.

explanation:

awnser: the oxford dictionary of quotations (oup 1970) has 66 pages of quotations

attributed to the writings of william shakespeare in which there are 2369 quotations,

which may reflect well over 5000 speeches, discussions, observations and comments

that are present in shakespeare’s work. it is largely from those speeches and discussions

on shakespeare’s 37 plays, as well as his, and others’ poems, that examples have been

taken here.

in this book all quotations from his poems and plays have been taken from various

editions of the arden shakespeare.

the writer is very much indebted to the rapid response provided by his son, henry

audley-charles , for cries of , guidance, advice and repairs to his ageing pc, that

henry provided at all hours. without this assistance over the last 3 years this book

could not have been written.

in addition, the writer is much for the kind by discussion and proof readings from

elizabeth macbeth and janet hulse; and for his knowledge of shakespeare’s plays and

poems in discussions with monsieur francis saillart; and especially for years of proof

reading, support and with this book from my wife brenda amy cordeiro. above

all, the debt i owe is to professor david price, vice provost research. he has acted as

the editor and the guide for the whole project. this has been far from easy with

changes repeatedly being made by the author and which continued after professor price

had provided all the editorial structure for this project.