The reader can infer from the Article that . Press enter to interact with the item, and press tab button or down arrow until reaching the Submit button once the item is selectedAIt is unlikely that the decision in the 1994 McDonald's case has had any influence on the way judges have ruled in similar cases.
BIt is unlikely that the judge will side in Deanna Salas-Solano's favor in the 2017 case against Starbucks since there was a dog in the car.
CIn deciding the May 2017 case against Starbucks, the judge probably did not consider the testimony from a Starbucks employee who cited 80 complaints per month about lids leaking and popping off.
DIn the 1994 case against McDonald's, the judge probably held McDonald's responsible, in part because officials admitted that the coffee was too hot to drink when it was handed to the plaintiff.

when the drink was too hot the plantiff got mad and it was leaking

Explanation:

Two statements support the claim that Jenner has been given credit for starting and spreading the practice of immunization:

Jenner became interested in the protective effects of cowpox during his apprenticeship. Here, we are told that Edward Jenner started working on ways to defend the body against diseases as early as during his apprenticeship when he was a teenager. He had been told that farm workers who had contracted cowpox were immune to the smallpox epidemic which was spreading across Europe at the time. He then started working on a vaccine containing cowpox.

Jenner made the first step to erase smallpox. This first step was to try his new smallpox vaccine on a child in 1796. The child did not catch smallpox. In order to get recognition and validation from the authorities, Jenner administered his vaccine to 22 more people, with success.

Explanation: