Summarize the opposing opinions regarding Keeling Pilaro's request to play on an all-girls' field hockey team. Present the reasoning for both sides of the argument. Which line of reasoning do you consider to be stronger, and why?

I believe that the line of reasoning that allows Pilaro to play in the women's team is stronger.

Explanation:

Pilaro is a boy who wants to play on his school's female hockey team. he is an extremely talented player and although he has a strong desire to join the male team, he believes he can contribute to the improvement of the female team, which many people agree, since he is an extremely talented and well-trained player and that his addition to the women's team has been very positive.

However, many people believe this is wrong, first because it hurts all the traditionalism of the sport and second because, as a boy, Pilaro would have biological advantages over girls. This argument can be overturned by the fact that well-trained girls can be so excellent in sports as much as boys and for that reason, I believe that the arguments in favor of Pilaro are stronger and more consistent.

why biographies are better than plays

explanation someone is saying they like biographies better

can i see the painting?