Can someone proofread my paragraph real quick just to make sure it doesn't sound dumb. People like to make the argument that graffiti makes some places look unsafe, ugly, and unsettling. People like to think in this way because when people think of graffiti they think about taggers, these people like to represent gangs, and slurs written on the wall they think that because graffiti artists and taggers have similar methods, and get confused and just judge a book by it's cover when going to places with a lot of graffiti on the walls.

Read the sentence. the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing only about the same as a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be printed and still look good, it made loads of money. which best revises this sentence to create a more formal style and tone? *the great wave was as cheap as buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made and still look great, people started making piles of money. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, costing about the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look exquisite, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave cost next to nothing, practically the same as a double of noodles. since mass quantities could be produced and still look awesome, it became highly profitable to sell. *the great wave was inexpensive to purchase, similar to buying a double of noodles. since lots of copies could be made that still looked amazing, those who sold it made tons of money.