Use the sheriff's words and attitude as presented in this line from "a jury of her peers" to explain why the men could not find any incriminating evidence in mrs. wright's home.

"'nothing here but kitchen things,' he said, with a little laugh for the insignificance of kitchen things."

I believe the person above is right about the women's domain, but I feel like the reason why the men couldn't figure anything out is because cooking is not their concern, it's the wife's concern. Because of this, they were literally out of their domain, nothing seemed out of the ordinary, while the women knew exactly what was going on. Cooking is something they're use to, so what is "kitchen things" to the men, is much more significant to the women.

Explanation:

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

as you read the passage below, consider how dana gioia uses

evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.

reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.

stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.

explanation: