Passage 1: Families would benefit greatly from a four-day school week. In today's society, many family calendars are full every moment of the day. With a shorter school week, families would be able to spend quality time together. In addition, each family member would have more time to rest and recharge for the upcoming school week. Both of these benefits will lead to healthier families and higher-achieving students, so schools should make the change as soon as possible.

Passage 2:
Our school district should improve the student experience by changing the length of the school week to four days. Elementary students, who typically need free, active playtime, would then have a three-day weekend. Upper-grade students, who require more sleep, would have an extra day to catch up on sleep missed during the week. In addition, students would have another weekend day to work at their jobs. Finally, all students would have more time to recharge for the upcoming school week.
Which statement best compares the viewpoints of the two passages?

A. The first passage tries to persuade readers that younger children will benefit most from a shorter school week, while the second passage says it will only help students in upper grades.

B. The first passage tries to persuade readers that families will benefit from a four-day school week, while the second passage tries to persuade readers that the change will benefit students.

C. Although the first passage tries to persuade readers that students will earn higher grades with an extra day to study, the second passage focuses on the physical rest that students will gain.

D. Although the first passage tries to persuade readers that parents favor a shorter school week, the second passage tries to persuade readers that students want the shorter week.