Article One: Food that fuels Article Two: Defeating Dragons
Contrast #1 (First difference)
What is different about the two groups of teens and how they work within their organizations?
Information from Article 1 to support the difference:
Information from Article 2 to support the difference:

Contrast #2 (Second difference)
What is different about the two groups of teens and the services they provide?
Information from Article 1 to support the difference:
Information from Article 2 to support the difference:

Compare Two Articles
How are the two groups of teens alike?
Information from article 1 to support the comparison:
Information from article 2 to support the comparison:

Part 1

What does manns conclusion in "coming of age in the dawnland" indicate about how the settlements and people of sixteenth-century new england reacted to the increasing presence of europeans?

Read the passage first of all if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that[it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norway gazed down upon the world from it’s summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.

In the following conversation, which group discussion technique does emily most clearly show?