subject
English, 14.12.2020 21:20 stevensquad638

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. By the late 1700s, Saint Domingue (what is now Haiti) was the world center of sugar. So many sugar plantations dotted the landscape that slaves called commanders managed other slaves. On the night of August 14, 1791, commanders from the richest sugar plantations in Saint Domingue gathered in a place called Alligator Woods and swore a solemn oath. They would rise up against their white owners, "and listen to the voice of liberty which speaks in the hearts of all of us." That voice told them to destroy everything related to sugar. Sugar made the Africans slaves, so sugar must be wiped off the island, now a vast sugar factory to the world. By the end of August, the French colony was in flames. So many cane fields were on fire that the air was filled with "a rain of fire composed of burning bits of cane-straw which whirled like thick snow." Smashing mills, destroying warehouses, setting fields on fire, the freedom fighters demolished some one thousand plantations—and that was just in the first two months of their revolution. The fight against sugar and chains soon had a leader, Toussaint, who called himself "L’Ouverture"—the opening. Toussaint was making a space, an opening, for people to be free. How do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim in this passage? They use primary-source quotations to show that enslaved people in Saint Domingue were willing to destroy property to gain their freedom. They use secondary-source quotations to show the plan that the commanders devised in Alligator Woods in August of 1791. They use primary-source information to describe the role of commanders on sugar plantations in Saint Domingue. They use secondary-source information to describe Toussaint’s plan to enslave all the people working on the sugar plantations.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
The difference between point of view and choice of person in a story is that "person" is the literary name given to main characters in a story, and "point of view" is the perspective from which we view the story "person" is part of a term used to describe the type of narrator (as in first-person or third-person); "point of view" is how the antagonist understands the events of a story the terms are interchangeable; there is really no difference between them "point of view" refers to the perspective from which the story is told; "person" is part of a term used to describe a type of narrator (as in first-person or third-person)
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:40
Thomas paine's common sense convicted colonists to
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
The empire state building was constructed by one hundred workers
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:30
Both wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea and spiegelman’s maus relate events of the holocaust from a jewish survivor’s perspective. using the third-person point of view. by retelling the experiences of friends. through the eyes of their fathers.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. By the late 1700s, Saint Domingue (what is now Haiti)...
Questions
question
Medicine, 30.08.2019 00:10
Questions on the website: 13722359