Charles just wants to prove his innocence and collect the insurance money. He had nothing to do with his store
burning down. His lawyer, Leang, believes him to be a good
man. She is determined to fight for Charles's right to the
money
But the insurance company's lawyer, Manu, has other
plans. Sure, Charles probably didn't burn down his own
store, but no matter. Manu doesn't have to prove it. He just
has to cast doubt on Leang's case. The judge, Cassie, isn't
sure who to believe yet, and neither is the court reporter,
Victor
Which character is most clearly a protagonist?
A. Manu
B. Victor
OC. Cassie
O D. Leang

The protagonist happens to be:

O C. Cassie

Explanation:

In Ancient Greek, the word protagonist, simply means the person who plays the chief role in any given events whether in real life or in a play. Going by the excerpts above, it could be seen that, the issue of the burnt shop and Charles Cassie is what is the basis of argument between the lawyers on both sides and the Judge.

The Judge was having a hard time on trying to come to the best judgement on who to believe regarding to the incident. Definitely, Charles happens to be the protagonist since he is the person playing the chief role.

what are your options ?

i would say years or cherry blossoms

oka

i think i seen this before