Who is more of a beast: the man or the narrator in “The Beast in the cave”? Justify your response using evidence from the text.
HELP
The following questions may help you form a response: why might the man be considered a beast? Why might the narrator be considered a beast? Whose actions were the most beast-like? Whose actions were the least beast-like?

The narrator.

Explanation:

The narrator in “The Beast in the cave” is more of a beast than the man because the narrator kill the man with the stone without seeing it. The beast are those organisms who killed other organisms for their own benefits so we can say that the narrator is a beast who killed the man for saving himself. The man considered as a beast because he walks strangely with non-human footsteps. The man actions were the most beast-like while the narrator actions were the least beast-like.

to gain popularity at school, fitzgerald wrote plays for the school and cast himself as the star. he also joined one of the universitys most prestigious clubs.

b)metaphor

explanation:

when reading the sentence carefully it says,"hope is a thing with feathers" it's like saying: hope is a thing like feathers

get what i'm saying? instead of using a smilie like or as they use "with"

it would be nice enough if i got .