3. What is the main argument of the passage? What claims does the author make to support the argument? How valid, relevant, and sufficient is the reasoning and evidence used to support the argument and claims? Does the author use false statements or fallacious reasoning to support the argument and claims? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your evaluation of the argument should be two or three complete paragraphs. I WILL FLAG ANY UNNECESSARY ANSWERS. PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY ANSWER ARE THE ONES WHO DESERVE POINTS

The main argument of the passage is discussed below in details.

Explanation:

Social media is, nevertheless, a good alternative to stay in touch with colleagues and family who reside far away. But if we concentrate more on the characters online than those who are nearby corporally, or if we let our colleagues who are near become online patrons only, then we have a difficulty. We can manage those online associations, but we should never replace them with real-life agreements with people with whom we can communicate and do stuff in person.

what is the question that you are asking

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.