This question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B. How is the structure of Passage 2 different from the structure of Passage 1?

A. Passage 2 presents different viewpoints of the same event, whereas Passage 1 is limited to the mother's point of view.
B. Passage 2 highlights important moments through flashbacks, whereas Passage 1 focuses on a chronological narrative.
C. Passage 2 uses an analogy to demonstrate the lesson, whereas Passage 1 allows the narrator to learn a lesson through her experience.
D. Passage 2 builds on a conflict as the poem progresses, whereas Passage 1 features a conflict that grows and grows over the course of the story.

Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion