Part D In this part of the activity, you will evaluate your three critiques of the poem.
You will first need to recall what you learned about intentional and affective.
fallacies in this unit. W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley coined both terms.
The term Intentional fallacy refers to the idea that an author's purpose or
intention in writing a work of literature has no importance in appreciating or
critiquing that work. The term offective fallacy refers to the idea that how a
work affects a reader or what emotions it arouses in the reader have no
importance in appreciating or critiquing that work. Read this knowledge
Article to learn more about New criticism and the affective and
intentional fallacies,
Evaluate your response to part A. Explain the disadvantages of emphasizing
background information, such as historical context when critiquing a poem.
Be sure to include examples from your analyses.

d. cassius cannot believe that a weakling like caesar has become so great.

i’m writing a memoir and i’ve been given the great suggestion of placing a ‘sub-narrative’ within some of the chapters – sort of, what was going on with me in the grand scheme of things.

i was wondering how to format this so that it is very obvious we are stepping out the of story.

firstly is a change in font from serif to sans workable? i also use dashes for a scene change. was thinking of using a different scene-changer too.

here’s a (shortened) example:

university – or what’s known as ‘uni’ in australia – were some of the best days of my life. where else do you get to potter around in a great location, have very little responsibility, learn lots of things, do lots of things and walk out four years later with a bonus – a degree!

with my university years i had immersed myself into community of intelligent ambitious people. generally everyone had a confidence about themselves. they knew where they were going in life and weren’t threatened by others.

—–

next normal paragraph continues here…

(sorry couldn’t show the fonts in this comment field)

too much?