Serena Williams' catsuit controversy evokes the
battle over women wearing shorts

Answer and Explanation:

"Serena Williams' catsuit controversy evokes the battle over women wearing shorts" is an article that offers a discussion of the issue surrounding sportswear worn by female athletes. The article discusses how these clothes are judged and sexualized, when it aims to help the athlete and make her comfortable during matches. The author reinforces that the clothes used by male athletes do not suffer the same judgment, even if they are used for the same reasons.

A part of the article that reinforces this is: “Women who did wear athletic garb were supposed to keep out of the public eye because it was deemed unfeminine and, yes, immodest.”

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.