What two things does Dillard call ""a matter of statistical probabilities""?

She says that what we think about the climate and the behavior of life on earth is a matter of statistical probability.

Explanation:

Dillard shows how the climate and the way life on earth behaves in this regard is a matter of statistical probability, where anything can happen at any time. That's because the climate can change at any time and all life on earth will have to adapt to the new climate. Even in the middle of the seasons, this question of probability is present because even in defined seasons the climate can be uncertain and change.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

fond of fighting is the answer