How does the author's description of the bird as "offended at this conduct of the ball" support her description of the bird in Passage 1 as a whole? It supports the idea that the bird had some human-like qualities.

It explains how the bird's behavior was typical of birds from the wild.

It reinforces the idea that the bird would have been uable to survive in the wild.

It suggests that the bird was significantly smarter than other birds in the house.