Read this passage from Joseph Stalin's radio broadcast from July 3, 1941 Is it really true that the German Fascist troops are invincible, as is
ceaselessly trumpeted by boastful Fascist propagandists? Of
course not!
History shows that there are no invincible armies, and never have
been. Napoleon's army was considered invincible, but it was
beaten successively by Russian, English and German Armies.
Kaiser Wilhelm's German Army in the period of the first
imperialist war was also considered invincible, but it was beaten
several times by Russian and Anglo-French troops, and was
finally smashed by Anglo-French forces.
The same must be said of Hitler's German-Fascist Army of today,
This army has not met with serious resistance on the
Continent of Europe. Only on our territory has it met serious
resistance, and if as a result of this resistance the finest divisions
of Hitler's German Fascist Army have been defeated by our Red
Army, it means that this army, too, can be smashed and will be
smashed as were the armies of Napoleon and Wilhelm
Explain the rhetorical situation of Stalin's speech and how he uses rhetoric to
persuade his audience. Support your explanation with examples from the passage
and from the speech's historical context. Finally, make use of terminology from the
content of the unit to describe the speaker's rhetorical techniques,

B: will pay paul to ride his horse

Explanation:

a lot

explanation:

the hunger games, written by  suzanne collins, is fiction in the young adult genre, which is not my age group, but i found myself unable to put it down. its combination of nerve-racking tension, thrilling action, and engaging love story kept me up until the wee hours. i was surprised at how completely engrossing the plot was. like  brave new world, this story is set in a future where the government oppresses its people, but the book also borrows ideas from the greek myth of theseus and the minotaur.

divided into 12 districts, ruled by an oppressive government located at the  capitol. katniss everdeen, a 16-year-old girl from district 12, takes her younger sister’s place as one of 24 “tributes” selected every year to participate in the hunger games at the capitol.

while i found this book absolutely enthralling, i was surprised it was aimed at an audience of young adults. it seems extremely intense for anyone younger than 16 or 17. for example, there is a scene where one young tribute is slowly eaten alive by wolf-like creatures all night long, and katniss has to finally throw a weapon at him to end his misery. i found this a little too disturbing when i considered the age of the character.

the intensity of the action was something one would find in a more mature book, but the age of the characters and the simplicity of the prose were aimed at a much younger audience. in addition, this book was written in present tense, which i found annoying, but that’s more of a personal preference than a stylistic fault. it was also edited somewhat poorly, but that rarely distracted from the plot. for example, the author often spoke in sentence fragments to describe how katniss felt, which might have been an attempt to reflect on her thought process, but i found it disorienting to read a lot of really short sentences all together. it would have been better to vary the sentence length on occasion, but the story was still coherently.

overall,  the hunger games  was an excellent, enthralling read that i highly recommend. if it was more clearly marked for older teens, it would have been better, but it was a fantastic book with a wonderfully creative plot.

happy to .

pls mark as brainliest.