subject
English, 20.12.2019 20:31 ghari112345

It’s worth thinking about the incentive a wrestler might have to throw a match. maybe he accepts a bribe (which would obviously not be recorded in the data). or perhaps some other arrangement is made between the two wrestlers. keep in mind that the pool of elite sumo wrestlers is extraordinarily tight-knit. each of the sixty-six elite wrestlers fights fifteen of the others in a tournament every two months. furthermore, each wrestler belongs to a stable that is typically managed by a former sumo champion, so even the rival stables have close ties.

which of the following claims is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt?

the offering of a bribe is a guaranteed enticement for a champion sumo wrestler to purposely lose a match in a tournament.

the close relationship between sumo wrestlers could be an incentive for an elite wrestler to throw a match he doesn’t need to win.

because sumo wrestlers have strong social ties, it is a dishonor to throw a match in a tournament.

there is great pressure for sumo wrestlers to cheat in order to beat wrestlers from rival stables.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
How does the structure of his italian sonnet by petrarch support its theme
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:40
What is a career pathway for human services?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which major world event was near the birth of the modernist movement
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:40
Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
It’s worth thinking about the incentive a wrestler might have to throw a match. maybe he accepts a b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 09:20
question
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 09:20
question
Geography, 26.06.2019 09:30
question
Geography, 26.06.2019 09:30
question
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 09:30
Questions on the website: 13722362