Why are some theories (like cell theory or plate tectonics) more widely accepted then the theory of evolution, even though they are both scientific theories (and evolution has
more scientific data available)?

A lot of people dont like to accept the theory of evolution due to religion and etc.

Explanation:

These theories have all been proven with evidence and widely accepted around the world unlike the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution can be argued that there's no proof discoving any human evolving. Many have been stated but all of these have been proven false. If evolution is actually true then the fossil records should show continuous (although gradual) changes from the bottom to top layers. And this doesn't show. All of these animals in the fossil record appear fully developed simultaneously and very suddenly. In fact, just the human body is so complicated that it can't just evolve. That's why Christianity is so widely accepted because everything shouts that something made it. So to answer your question the theory of evolution can be argued and cannot really be proven unlike some of the other theories.

reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle

- "these rights are natural and god-given to all men equally." (i disagree cuz i kind of think it's 'a' but who knows.)