It is clear that for some of the characters, in "and then there were none", the only thing they have in common is their destination. Agatha Christie makes a deliberate effort to create characters who have opposing perspectives. Write a paragraph or two in which you identify those characters which seem to be natural adversaries and explain your reasoning.

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

Can you describe the word chalk without saying the words chalk or chalky? (type your own definition of the word.)

Asap‼️‼️ i need to figure out witch ones goes where