Apostrophe TEST!! SOMEONE HELP 1) This is the shoe of the girl.  . 2) We are at the room of the hotel.  . 3) He is the son of Marcus.  . 4) This is the house of Julie and Juan.  .

5) Please close the door of the car.  . 6) The flowers of the plant are red.  . 7) The website of the College is confusing.  . 8) I want to play the guitar of Ernesto.  . 9) Do you want to walk to the side of the river?  . 10) I want to ride in the car of Bobbie. 

Example: I am your friend.  I’m your friend.
1) I do not like vanilla ice cream.  . 2) I am going to the mall.  . 3) Who is the new student?  . 4) They are my best friends.  .

5) We are not waiting in the line.  . 6) She will be the class president.  . 7) He should not worry so much.  . 8) They will be here in fifteen minutes.  . 9) Where is my blue book?  . 10) She does not eat spinach.  .
Directions: Use what you have learned to punctuate the following sentences with apostrophes. Example: Where is the book of John?  Where’s John’s book?
1) This is not the key I was looking for. . 2) I want to pet the head of the dog. . 3) That is the hat of Jones. . 4) I need to go to the market of the town to buy milk. . 5) Did you not wash the car of Bill? . 6) This wallet belongs to Tito. . 7) This one is nicer than the one that Dan has. . 8) It is funny when the dog chases its tail. . 9) We should not take the car of my father to the beach. . 10) She is the best student in the college.

Read these sentences. when the fever seemed to be near an end, the city of philadelphia became active once again. shops opening and people coming out of their homes, ships began to sail on the river. which transition phrase best connects the ideas? by the same token on the contrary in addition to in this case

Meeee i’m in need of answerering this

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."