Can someone please help me with this if they have the time? 1. Based on the rhetoric Dr. King uses in his letter, who is his intended audience?

a) Clergymen who are confused by his efforts
b) Clergymen who are unfamiliar with his efforts c) Clergymen who are disapproving of his efforts
d) Clergymen who are undecided about his efforts

2. statement best explains how Dr. King's discussion of Which the four steps of a nonviolent campaign serves his argument?

a) It explains why nonviolent action is almost as effective as violence.
b) It advances nonviolent action as a negotiation tool.
c) It shows the power of nonviolent action against segregation.
d) It justifies the need for nonviolent action

3. Throughout the beginning pages of his letter, Dr. King mostly supports his argument for immediate action by
a) using logical appeal
b) establishing his authority
c) using emotional appeal
d) establishing his credibility

4. A logical fallacy Dr. King addresses in his letter is that peaceful protests are bad because they lead to violence. What effect does addressing this logical fallacy have on the essay?

a) It makes the point that protesters cannot be blamed for violence committed by others.
b) It supports the point that white moderates are blocking the flow of progress.
c) It reinforces the point that action can be effective even if it is nonviolent.
d) It proves the point that oppressors never grant anyone freedom voluntarily.

5. Dr. King compares just and unjust laws in order to explain why African Americans

a) have the right to break some laws
b) are facing an unfair judicial system
c) are justified in feeling resentful
d) have been too frightened to protest

Plagiarism quiz read both the paragraph below and the information following it that identifies the source using the american psychological association format. then read each of the numbered statements and determine if each is plagiarized or not. circle “yes” if the statement is plagiarized, “no” if it is not, and then fix the “yes” answers). original source the presence of the taiwanese on everest was a matter of grave concern to most of the other expeditions on the mountain. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid, risking further lives, to say nothing of jeopardizing the opportunity for other climbers to reach the summit. but the taiwanese were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified. camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby, who announced his intention to make a solo ascent of the southwest face, one of the peak’s most dangerous and technically demanding routes—despite the fact that his himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking. krakauer, j. (1998). into thin air: a personal account of the mount everest disaster. new york: anchor books, 122 - 3. student samples yes 1. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid(krakauer, 1998). no) 2. many climbers overestimate their abilities, as krakauer (1998) explains when he writes of peter neby, whose himalayan experience in the past “required little more than vigorous walking” (122 - 3). no 3. jon krakauer (1998) discusses other concerns besides those of unpredictable weather and his own climbing group’s capabilities. for example the existence of a taiwanese group on everest was a matter of serious unease to most everyone else on the mountain. yes/no 4. krakauer (1998) states that the taiwanese group was not the only inexpert climbers to attempt mt. everest: camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby. . [whose] himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking (122 – 3). yes/no 5. the author asserts that the taiwanese “were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified.” yes/no 6. in his book into thin air, jon krakauer (1998) discusses many of the dangers he noted prior to his disastrous attempt to climb mt. everest in 1996. among them were encounters with other groups and individual climbers who were ill-trained and ill-equipped to handle the demands of such a climb.