Which sentence has an inappropriate shift in person? They were happy to go to the fair, where they could play games.

I like living in the city, where I can meet lots of new people.

When my dad was a kid, you had to walk to school every day.

When my grandfather was young, people made a lot of their own food.

The first one "they were happy to go to the fair, where they could play games."

Explanation:

The first part says "they were happy to go to the fair" with "were" being in present form (past form would be 'was', future form would be 'would'). The second half says "where they could play games." and 'could' is in future tense.

The first half has a present tense verb while the second half has a future tense verb. So the answer is 1.

based on the biblical principle philippians 4: 13 "i can do everything through christ who strengthens me." i agree that it is through him that we are given the strength to cope with every situation.

and based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32 "better to get angry slowly than to be a hero. better to be even-tempered than to capture a city."   i agree with the author of the passage to the extent that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are contemptuous, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and make sure to not hurt other people and their feelings are strong people.

theres no poem include that