Which citation correctly reflects mla guidelines for a website without an author?

n. a. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. net. 14 june 2013.
n. a. the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. web. 14 june 2013.
the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. net. 14 june 2013.
the land down under. australia department of tourism, 1 february 2013. web. 14 june 2013.

The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Web. 14 June 2013.

According to the list of options, the last one is correct. When information is unavailable when creating a citation, just leave it out. If you put N.A. in its place the reader might think the author is listed as N.A. since some authors only use initials in their work (A.A. Milne...). The information is the title of the source followed by the publishing organization. Next is the date of creation followed by the access date.

Please note: this question is out of date. The new MLA guidelines would cite this source now as:

The Land Down Under. Australia Department of Tourism, 1 February 2013. Accessed 14 June 2013. The URL would be included after the date of creation. The word Web is no longer required.

kennedy creates personal credibility by saying he is more than fit to lead. he talks about the sixty day period that he constructed administration, and says based on that he will be an acceptable leader.

jfk has a great reputation as an american citizen. he fought in wwii, and earned the navy and marine corps medal. he saved several men on his pt-109 patrol torpedo boat after an attack by the japanese navy. he also served in congress for the 11th congressional district for massachusetts, and served three terms in the house of representatives.

explanation:

i think the answer might compound