Click this link to view O*NET’s Tasks section for Emergency Medical Technicians. Note that common tasks are listed toward the top, and less common tasks are listed toward the bottom. According to O*NET, what are some common tasks performed by Emergency Medical Technicians? Select three options. The development of educational programs to teach children about first aid.
Visiting patient homes to assist with basic tasks, such as grooming, meal preparation, and light housekeeping.
The creation of fire escape plans for residential facilities.
The maintenance of vehicles with medical and communication equipment.
Administering first aid treatment or life support care
Immobilizing patients for the placement on stretcher and ambulance transport

The maintanece of vehicles with medical and communication equipment.

Administering first aid treatment or life support care

Immobilizing patients for the placement on stretcher and ambulance transport.

Explanation:

4) The maintenance of vehicles with medical and communication equipment.

5) Administering first aid treatment or life support care

6) Immobilizing patients for the placement on stretcher and ambulance transport.

Explanation:

answer: i would say he was very determined and persistent in overcoming obstacles.

explanation:   "the magician of menlo park" as he was called, liked to tell an incident that happened when he was 8 years old and came back home crying after attending school for three months because his teacher called him "sterile and unproductive". from nowadays perspective, we can say that thomas alva edison was one of the most persistent and determined man that has ever existed. when edison was 14, he contracted scarlet fever. the effect of the fever, as well as a blow to the head by an angry train conductor, caused edison to become completely deaf in his left ear, and 80-percent deaf in the other. so as you can see he had to struggle to not so many minor issues but he always succeeded.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war