Can someone write me a paragraph on Genocide I'm gonna add it to my essay I have until 11:59 so take your time :)

As the Genocide Convention of 1948 states, “at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on

humanity” (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 24). Nevertheless, the twentieth century was termed the “century of genocide”

because of the high number of cases of genocide during that time period (Bartrop 2002: 522). For the purpose of this

essay, the definition of genocide will be taken from the Genocide Convention, which defines genocide as “intent to

destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. The genocide of the Armenians, the

Holocaust and the genocide in Rwanda are the three genocides of the twentieth century that fit that definition

(Destexhe 1994: 4-5). In this essay, the causes of modern genocide will be investigated using these three genocides

as case studies. There are various reasons why genocide may occur and it is often a combination of circumstances

that leads to genocide. The present essay will investigate the underlying conditions that make genocide possible,

while leaving out catalytic events that may trigger genocide. The essay will firstly draw on the works of Horkheimer

and Adorno in examining the relations between Enlightenment ideas and genocide. The correlations between war

and economic crises will be subject to analysis in the second part of the essay. Finally, the creation of out-groups and

in-groups will be explored. While these are certainly not the only causes of genocide, they may be deemed to be preconditions.

Raphael Lemkin coined the term “genocide” in the 1940s with the Holocaust in mind, which for him signified the

return of an enlightened people to barbarism (Freeman 1995: 210). Similarly, Foster (1980: 2) sees the Holocaust as

an aberration of an enlightened and developed nation. However, there are other scholars who argue that genocide is

not an exception of Enlightenment but in fact a result of it. Horkheimer and Adorno (1973: 3-4) argue that the ideals of

Enlightenment, which are human emancipation and rationality, alienate humans from nature and result in men

wanting to control nature and, in turn, other people as well. Bauman (1989: 91), continuing this idea over a decade

later, proposes that since the Enlightenment, the extermination of a people serves to establish a perfect society. The

Enlightenment brought with it the belief in an evolutionary development towards a better society through state

engineering (Bauman 1989: 70; Kaye and Stråth 2000: 11). “Gardening” and “modern medicine” were used as

metaphors for human tasks that would improve a society (Bauman 1989: 70). In the enlightened world, a state can

become a “wonderful utopia” (Hamburg 2008: 44) through “designing, cultivating and weed-poisoning” (Bauman1989: 13). It is a modern idea that everything can be measured and classified, even a “race” and its character

(Bauman 1989: 68). This classification of races, coupled with the modern idea of a constantly improvable society,

leads to Social-Darwinist ideas of the survival of the fittest (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 15).

Armenians (Balakian 2008: 160), Jews (Bauman 1989: 76) and Tutsi (Mullen 2006: 172) were seen as worthless

groups standing between a population and the realisation of such a perfect society. Therefore, in the mind of the

“rational and enlightened” thinker, they were legitimate targets for extermination (Kaye and Stråth 2000: 15). This

“purifying” of the state through genocide is reflected in the language of the genocidaires (Stone 2004: 50).

Armenians were termed “tubercular microbes” and a local politician asked rhetorically “isn’t it the duty of a doctor to

destroy these microbes?” (Balakian 2008: 160). Hitler spoke of the “Jewish virus” and that “by eliminating the pest,

[he would] do humanity a service” (Bauman 1989: 71). Not only medical terms were used to justify the killings.

Gardening metaphors can also be found. In Rwanda, the chopping up of Tutsi men was called “bush clearing” and

slaughtering women and children was labelled as “pulling out the roots of the bad weeds” (Prunier 1997: 142). These

three examples support Bauman’s theory that the Enlightenment brought about the idea of being able to socially

engineer a perfect state. Genocide was consequently justified by the idea of “purifying” the state through tasks that a doctor or a gardener would employ in order to improve an unhealthy body or a garden.

Explanation: Your welcome by the way

the answers are:

1. dolores driscoll - b. first person minor

dolores is a minor character who happens to be driving the bus at the time of the accident. she narrates picking up each of the children and her last memory is the children being thrown around the bus.

2. billy ansel - a. first person major

billy loses his twins in the accident. he tells his own story, how he witnessed the accident and how he tried to the rescuers. he is a major character, as he is at the center of the story.

3. mitchell stephens - c. first person observer

mitchell enters the story after the accident. he is a lawyer who learns about the accident based on other characters observations. though he tells the story from a first person perspective, he is just an observer.

as for matcthing the message or lesson posted with the person who said them:

1."obviously, you can't control everything, but you are obliged to take care of the few things you can. i'm an optimist basically who acts like a pessimist. on principle. just in case." - dolores driscoll

2. "i could no longer believe even in life. . for me now the only reality was death." - billy ansel