According to the definition of incitement - is Trump guilty, why or why not?

He is not.

Explanation:

The definition of incitement is to ''encourage or provoke someone to act against the law.''

It may appear as though former President Trump incited his supporters to attack the Capitol building but this is not the case. Yes he used conspiracy theories and unfounded claims about election manipulation but there was no where he explicitly encouraged illegal action.

He encouraged his supporters to fight to stop President Biden's victory and he said they should never give up. Both these things can be done legally. Perhaps the most significant evidence pointing to the opinion that he did not incite the crowd was him saying:

''I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.''

Based on the above, an argument can be made that even though he called upon his supporters to march on the Capitol, he told them to do it peacefully which wouldn't be the case in an incitement.

If he could be found guilty of failing to discourage the insurrection even though he knew it could have happened, he should be because he knew the character of some of his supporters.

Of an incitement however, strictly speaking, he is not guilty.

d. pushing his plate away from the edge of the table idk what the other guy was trying to

answer: the gettysburg address is a speech delivered by abraham lincoln at the november 19, 1863, dedication of soldier’s national cemetery, a cemetery for union soldiers killed at the battle of gettysburg during the american civil war.

explanation: