subject
English, 09.03.2021 17:40 scottytohotty

Which statement best explains how the two authors disagree? A Boylan thinks that GM foods may cause allergies and should be
labeled, but Silva sees only the benefits of these foods.
B Silva believes that GM foods are superfoods, but Boylan thinks GM
foods can only cause harm.
C Boylan believes that GM foods may have some important benefits,
but Silva believes that the benefits of GM foods are not significant.
DSilva thinks the unknown dangers of GM foods are a major concern,
but Boylan feels that GM foods are safe.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 20:00
How does nunez end up in the country of the blind
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:50
Question from select the correct answer. what argument is susan b. anthony making in the passage? a. male citizens created the laws to secure the rights of men, so legal reform is required to secure women’s rights. b. women are often punished for committing criminal acts that are pardoned when committed by men. c. women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males. d. the court judge modified the original documents to arrest and try anthony unfairly. has anyone else got this?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Write one paragraph that evaluates the effectiveness of jack zipes's essay
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:20
Could someone me with this question?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement best explains how the two authors disagree? A Boylan thinks that GM foods may cause...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2019 02:00
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2019 02:00
question
Business, 20.09.2019 02:00
Questions on the website: 13722362