In your estimation, which argument—Point or Counterpoint—won the debate in the selection “De-Extinction: The Science and Ethics of Bringing Lost Species Back to Life”? In a structured argument of approximately one page, explain why you think either the Point or the Counterpoint argument is more successful than the other. Make sure to address the amount and relevance of the evidence in each essay, as well as the overall validity of the reasoning in both arguments and whether or not they contain any fallacious reasoning. In what way did the more successful argument best use text structure and persuasive techniques to help organize and enhance its claims? Cite specific passages from both the Point and the Counterpoint sides of the de-extinction debate as evidence for your evaluation.

hey wanna : ) ; )

as we know, the english language is spoken all over the world by native and non-native speakers and has become the most certain tool when it comes to communicating. businesses, schools, even romantic relationships depend on it to keep thriving. in addition, it is the language of the internet not only because most of the content available is in english, but also because people prefer to use it when talking to others, since it's the language everyone supposedly learns.

yet, there have been some current claims that chinese will soon take over as the most important language in the world. china's magnitude has never been more evident and doing business with the chinese is a gold mine for any country. we now see language schools offering chinese courses as commonly as english.

however - even though we cannot deny china's importance and the advantage it is when someone takes the time to learn the language their business contact speaks-, people in general seem to be ignoring the aspects that seem to keep english as the chosen one of languages. one of them has been mentioned above: it is the language of the internet. also, chinese people are still learning english, since it opens doors in communicating with practically everyone else, from every single country.

note: if this is not the sort of transition you need, let me know. : d

can you give us the poems?

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.