Only answer if you have read the stories and you have to answer questions 1-9 if you can't please skip this question): Write an Evaluation of an Argument: For this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. 1) Patrick Henry's " Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!" speech (1775). 2)Frefrick Douglass's address, " What to the Slave Is the fourth of July?" (1852). ( Answer questions 1-9) Question 1) What is the speaker's viewpoint? What is his claim?. Question 2) What reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? Question 3) How valid are the speaker's for his claim? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 4) What evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? Question 5) Is the speaker's evidence relevant and sufficient? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 6) Does tbe speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? Use evidence from the text to support your answers. Question 7) What counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? Question 8) How effective is the speaker's response to counterclaims or alternate claims? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 9) Write A One- Paragraph Evaluation Of The Speaker's Argument. ( Will Mark Brainliest need two really good and truthful responses. Make sure you choose either one and answer all questions 1 - 9). If you haven't read either of these stories then please please don't leave a response. ​

Read the passage from animal farm. "that was part of the arrangement! " cried squealer. "jones's shot only grazed him. i could show you this in his own writing, if you were able to read it. the plot was for snowball, at the critical moment, to give the signal for flight and leave the field to the enemy. and he very nearly succeeded—i will even say, comrades, he would have succeeded if it had not been for our heroic leader, comrade napoleon. do you not remember how, just at the moment when jones and his men had got inside the yard, snowball suddenly turned and fled, and many animals followed him? and do you not remember, too, that it was just at that moment, when panic was spreading and all seemed lost, that comrade napoleon sprang forward with a cry of 'death to humanity! ' and sank his teeth in jones's leg? surely you remember that, comrades? " exclaimed squealer, frisking from side to side. now when squealer described the scene so graphically, it seemed to the animals that they did remember it. at any rate, they remembered that at the critical moment of the battle snowball had turned to flee. but boxer was still a little uneasy. how does the characterization of squealer support the author’s purpose? squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and stalin’s propagandists. squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.

Need answer asap plz! the descriptions of the west wind in the first two sections of “ode to the west wind” are dominated by images of a. violence, death, decay, and burial. c. peace, birth, growth, and blossoming. b. sleep, dreams, fantasy, and reverie. d. translucence, light, color, and radiance.

Tobias wolff most likely named his short story "mortals" because the story explores the theme of people coming to terms with the idea that one day they too will die. wanting to find out what their loved ones really think of them. achieving immortalit by being "big people" while they are alive. hoping that they will have accomplished something before they die.