PLS HELP ME, TIMED, I give quick 1. By attacking an unrelated claim to create an appeal to emotion

2. by stating that the opposing claim will lead to more harmful things

3. by including the views of an expert to create an appeal to authority in the claim

4. by drawing a conclusion that all people who support the claim think the same way

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

provide the full question .

specific audience will understand the main ideas. for example, if you were writing an instruction manual for rocket scientists, it would likely look very different from one you would write for young children. your language, tone, and writing style would change significantly.

hum i think it this

prewriting

proofreading

presenting

editing and revising

first draft

planning

proofreading

presenting

prewriting

editing and revising

its that you did not giving me more hope this