NEED ASAP PLS HELP In module 3, you wrote a mission statement on your view of human nature. This semester, you have studied a number of authors: short stories by Richard Connell, James Thurber, Jack London, O. Henry, Guy de Maupassant, Frank Stockton, and Ambrose Bierce; a novella by Robert Louis Stevenson; and a novel by Charles Dickens.

Choose one author and work that we've studied so far this year that you think best expresses your view of human nature. You will write a well-developed paragraph describing how this literary work conveys your view of human nature. Consider a key character, theme, the author's tone toward a topic, etc. Where do you see an accurate portrayal of human nature?

Which is these is not a benefit of parallel structure? a)clarity b)classification c)emphasis d)balance

What is the main problem with the following critique? “you put some thought into it, but you obviously do not care much about the topic you are presenting.” a. it is not ethical. b. it is not constructive c. it is not specific. d. it is not behavior focused.

Read the excerpt from "mother tongue." lately, i’ve been giving more thought to the kind of english my mother speaks. like others, i have described it to people as “broken” or “fractured” english. but i wince when i say that. it has always bothered me that i can think of no other way to describe it other than “broken,” as if it were damaged and needed to be fixed, as if it lacked a certain wholeness and soundness. what best supports the inference that tan believes nonstandard english is no less valid than standard english? tan spends a lot of time thinking about her mother’s “fractured” english. tan has trouble thinking of descriptive words when she is writing. tan’s american education makes it difficult for her to understand her mother. tan winces when she describes her mother’s english as “broken.”