Which reason is the worst for giving a protagonist weaknesses or flaws? A) It allows the playwright to make mistakes without anyone noticing.
B) It gives more options for the character to grow.
C) It helps the audience connect, since no one is perfect.
D) It creates possibilities for conflict.

a. everything else is correct,

A) It allows the playwright to make mistakes without anyone noticing.

This is a terrible reason... it's just lazy. everything else makes sense. I would say that B and C are the best reasons, but D is a great reason too.

i think the answer is c

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest