15 POINTS CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHICH ONES ARE INCOMPLETE AND COMPLETE THINKING, THERE'S 3 FOR EACH OF THE THINKINGS!!

In the second paragraph, the writer provides more evidence of the power of the sibling relationship by quoting a psychologist. Daniel Shaw emphasizes how sibling conflicts are beneficial to teach how to get along. Siblings can’t split up like disagreeing friends can.

The writer offers a contrasting detail that even though siblings spend a lot of time together, that also means lots of conflict and disagreements. So they may have an important relationship, but it may not be a good one.

At the beginning of the second paragraph, the writer presents the argument that the reason siblings get along so much is because they grow up together.

The writer explains with several details how the time spent with one another helps cement sibling relationships. Siblings spend more time with each other than they do with any other relationship.

Based on the title and the first paragraph, I think the thesis, or main idea of the text, is how important sibling relationships are, often enduring many ups and downs of life. I’ll keep reading the text to see if the evidence supports this.

I think this is about celebrating relationships with our siblings like we do Mother’s Day and Father’s Day. Evart seems to think that siblings deserve a special day too, so I will read to see what evidence she offers to support that.
​

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

yes, it can be both.

active voice: my father cut the tree.

passive voice: the tree was cut by my father.

active voice: people buy newspapers every day.

passive voice: newspapers are bought (by people) every day.

active voice: people have been using movies as political propaganda since world war ii.

passive voice: movies have been used as political propaganda since world war ii.

active voice: donna gave me my birthday present.

passive voice: i was given my birthday present (by donna). / my birthday present was given to me (by donna).

active voice: mom will leave the keys on the counter.

passive voice: the keys will be left (by mom) on the counter.

the words in parentheses are the agent of the passive voice and can be omitted when obvious, generic, or simply unnecessary.

i think the answer is d.