If randy pausch, the author of last lecture, had written a speech explaining the different treatment options for pancreatic cancer patients to consider, which organizational structure would he most likely have used?

The correct answer to the question: If Randy Pausch, the author of "Last Lecture", had written a speech explaining the different treatment options for pancreatic cancer patients to consider, which organizational structure would he most likely have used?, would be: He would have used a compare and contrast structure.

Explanation:

Randy Pausch was a professor in some of the most prestiged American universities and he co-authored a book called "Last Lecture", published in 2008, after a famous speech that he delivered in September of 2007 called "Really Achieving your Childhood Dreams". The interesting thing about this speech is that it was delivered exactly one month before Pausch had learned that his pancreatic cancer, was terminal. Although Pausch did not want to speak much about his cancer, because he did not wish to feel the pity, if he had had the chance to write a speech on cancer treatments for patients, he would have had to use compare and contrast because in this way, he would have been able not just to mention the different options, but also offer enough information for patients to make the best decision.

i would say that it is a bad thesis because it doesn't explain what the health risks are. it seems to be a very vague thesis statement. thesis statements need to set up for the entire essay. it needs to give the reasons why people need to stop drinking diet soda.   so, i would say that it is a bad thesis.

hope this

"what's up? "- used to ask someone what they are doing or what they're feeling if they seem down.

"bro"- used to refer to a friend. shortened form of "brother"

"dude"- again, used to refer to a friend. typically gender neutral and does not always refer to a male

"hang"- (ex. "wanna hang? ") used to ask someone to spend time with you