In a group discussion, which statement most clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion? a. the author makes some good points, but i feel that he's ultimately biased. b. the author obviously hates the way fast food tastes, which is why he's negative. c. the author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like ''silly'' and "stupid". d. the author first criticizes fast food, and then goes on criticize junk food

Option c. the author proves that he's biased when he uses terms like ''silly'' and "stupid".

Explanation:

A conclusion is a recap of the main idea in a paper. It basically summarizes the content of the paper. In addition, the conclusion points readers back to the main idea as the reader is reading the paper. In this instance, the correct conclusion is drawn from option C where the passage uses the words quoted in the text.

the rhetoric device being used to persuade the audience is pathos.