6.what conclusion did the court reach?
7.what is your opinion about flag burning? should people be allowed to burn the flag? why or why not?
8.is the burning of the american flag, as a political protect, freedom of speech protected by the first amendment? use evidence from the first amendment to support your response.
9.does freedom of speech extend to non-verbal expression? explain your answer using specific examples?

6. That it was not illegal to burn the American flag

7. I do not believe that burning the flag should be allowed. Just because someone is upset with the judicial system does not mean they can disgrace over 200 years of hard work.

8. Yes, burning the flag Is protected under the first amendment. "abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances."- part of the first amendment stopping someone from burning the flag is infringing on their rights

9. Yes it does. A example is peaceful protest with posters or sit ins

- "about the claims : -

making a claim is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.' claims are not just opinions. a claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on your knowledge .

about the country claims : -

a counterclaim is just the opposite of a claim. counterclaims are also provable and supportable by reasons and evidence. not just, 'because i said so.' when you're planning an argument, you need to know what the counterclaim might be so that you can make sure that you disprove it with your reasons and evidence your research." - (catherineroberts)

the answer to this question