You are a politician delivering a very important speech that will be seen by thousands of people. which of the following would be the best method of delivery in this situation? a. memorized b. manuscript c. extemporaneous d. impromptu

This seems like a tricky question that needs to take into consideration different factors. In the first place, we are talking about a politician that is used to give speeches to great audiences, therefore we can say that he/she wouldn't be nervous. Here we are talking about a very important speech, that means it is a special occasion that is not seen on a daily basis.

Based on that I would say that the best method for the politician to deliver the speech is: a) memorized.

When memorizing a speech the speaker has the advantage that he can make eye contact with the audience as well as gestures that will make them react depending on the subject. The comunication seems direct and without hesitation, in this way the politician would seem as an expert on the topic, knowing exactly what to say and how to say it. In a presentation with thousands of people there won't be direct interaction between the audience and the speaker, the audience limits itself to listen and react. Although it is difficult to memorize an entire speech and say it without any problems, we asume the politician is an expert an will practice a lot before the meeting.

The other option that could be used is the c) extemporaneus in which the speaker has notes and the idea of the speech is well defined. This helps to have a more natural tone and to interact with the audience at the same time that gives the impression of professionalism. I didn't choose this one because of the amount of people receiving the message.  

i pretty sure it is old

explanation:

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )