subject
English, 03.02.2020 11:45 kamkam5791

Read the passage below and answer the question. now don't get me wrong. i mean, i want you to understand from the beginning that i'm not really so dumb. i know what a girl should do and what she shouldn't. i get around. i read. i listen to the radio. and i have two older sisters. so, you see, i know what's what. from "sixteen," by maureen daly in the passage above, what effect does the narrator's insistence that she is experienced actually have on the reader? it makes the reader understand that the narrator has a great deal of life experience. it makes the reader think the narrator is actually young and inexperienced. it makes the reader want to hear more about the narrator's interests in reading. it does not tell the reader anything about the narrator.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:20
It was extremely base of him to desert you in your time of need. ( change into exclamatory sentence)
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:40
How do the authors develop their claim about the effectiveness of restorative justice through examples involving apartheid and the rwandan genocide? cite evidence from the text in your response.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 15:30
Read the following passage and explain how wiesel interrupts the narration of the story to emphasize the truth behind what eliezer witnesses. "not far from us, flames, huge flames, were rising from a ditch. something was being burning there. a truck drew close and unloaded its hold: small children. babies! yes, 1 did see this, with my own children thrown into the frames. (is it any wonder that ever since then, sleep tends to elude me? )"
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage below and answer the question. now don't get me wrong. i mean, i want you to unders...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.04.2020 12:24
Questions on the website: 13722367