Will make you to person who answers correctly so plz me need it really badly will make free pointer for that person.
need answer really soon so could someone plz
choose the best review the argument.claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are jk word. conclusion: david is a jk word. which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?

question 5 options:

the writer is stereotyping david just because he likes peanut butter.

a preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.

the writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why david is a jk word.

it is possible that david is not among the group of people who like peanut better and are jk word.