Read the excerpt, and then complete the sentence that follows. deferred by langston hughes (excerpt) this year, maybe, do you think i can graduate? i’m already two years late. dropped out six months when i was seven, a year when i was eleven, then got put back when we come north…

maybe now i can have that white enamel stove i dreamed about when we first fell in love eighteen years ago. but you know, rooming and everything then

me, i always did want to study french. it don't make sense— i'll never go to france, but night schools teach french . .

someday, i'm gonna buy two new suits at once!
all i want is one more bottle of gin.
all i want is to see my furniture paid for.

langston hughes uses and jazz formats in this poem to emphasize how african american dreams remained unfulfilled.

langston hughes uses
a.) improvisation
b.) scat
c.) blues
d.) alliteration


a.) swing
b.) call and response
c.) alliteration
d.) syncopation

During the Harlem Renaissance, improvisation, and syncopation also combined with poetry to create jazz poetry.

Langston Hughes uses A. Improvisation and D. Syncronysation jazz formats in this poem to emphasize how African American dreams remained unfulfilled.

The Harlem Renaissance was a scholarly and social recovery of African American music, dance, craftsmanship, design, writing, theater and governmental issues focused in Harlem, Manhattan, New York City, crossing the 1920s and 1930s.

Poet from the Harlem Renaissance left an endless effect on present day and contemporary verse, motivating the Black Arts development of the 1960s and 70s, just as global craftsmanship developments of the African diaspora, known as Negrismo in the Caribbean and Negritude in the Francophone world.

For more information, refer the following link:

link

the answer is b-$11,337.

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.