How do readers know that they have found the true meaning of an allegorical story ?

Explanation:

It's actually hard to sat, since that allegories is materialise abstract forms, making visible what it's not.

Allegories were used to represent values, feelings, ideas with a physical form.

So, readers know the true meaning when they analyse the background meaning on the history, not the literal one. Because, literal meanings are not the true meaning of allegories.

In advance to understand, they must effort to see the meaning behind the visible, touchable meaning.

many scientists' predictions of climate change include: warmer temperatures, rising sea levels, and more frequent storms.

that is the wrong

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."