Which sentence best demonstrates the author's opinion of christian missionary work in china?

a.) "christianity ought to make a strong appeal to such minds, taking from them none of the joy or assurance or devotion which they possess, but promoting a deeper, better balanced interpretation of the active world, a nobler conception of god, a stronger sense of sinfulness and need, and a truer idea of the full meaning of incarnation and revelation."

b.) "it seeks to the student to discriminate, to think in terms of a devotee of buddhism when he compares that religion with christianity."

c.) "at the same time he has taken pains to exhibit and to interpret the religious life of the peasant as affected by buddhism."

d.)"no one can come into contact with the best that buddhism offers without being impressed by its serenity, assurance and power."

The answer is A.

 The Christian missionary work in China, as the author declares, is the work that follows the commission given in the Bible to any Christian called to go to a foreign country, in a different culture. That is, showing Christianity in a positive way, respecting their beliefs, at the same time that new spiritual concepts are presented, such as a merciful God, the need for salvation and the verb becoming flesh, God coming to mankind.

3w3q2wdasz3

explanation:

4htef6rthf6tjr

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.