That to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own; translate?

The correct answer is the following.

Rewrite the excerpt of Thomas Jefferson “Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom” in your own words.  

Freedom to choose and profess a religion is of the utmost importance in the country. A civil magistrate could have the power to interfere in this matter, but the Church doesn’t need to have the power and presence it has in the old days to influence people. Magistrates should be accountable for intervention in religious considerations, letting people decide what to profess. Although other people have different beliefs, they not should be judged because of that, knowing that respect is the key to peaceful living.

Thomas Jefferson wrote the “Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom” statement in which he defends freedom of thinking and the principle of separation between government and church. The statement was passed by the Virginia General Assembly on January 16, 1786.  

different strategies reach different people based on their ability to understand the material. (from personal experience) when writing an argumentative essay write explaining the subject as though your audience never heard of it before and it is just being introduced, then explain why other people hate it also, afterward you would explain why that would be wrong. i hope that : )

answer: b

explanation: