How should a writer address opposing views in an argument? (5 points)

the writer should ignore opposing views so as to not bring attention to conflicting information.

the writer should mention opposing views to point out the flaws of those who believe in them.

the writer should use facts that can be verified to address and disprove opposing viewpoints.

the writer should give equal attention and value to opposing views, including using evidence.

C is the best way to deal with an argument you have to deal with that is not in agreement with your own views.

If you can present facts that show your opponent to be in error, that is the best way to counter an argument. The facts must be honestly obtained and easily verified.

D is also possible, but you do not want to become embroiled in another person's argument. You want to disarm it if you can and leave it at that.

B is not the way to deal with any argument. It sounds like you are attacking the person's psychology for believing something that does not agree with what you believe in. It is never a good policy to do that.

A is wrong as well. You never ignore another person's point of view if you are honest. You recognize its good points and point out the flaws of the argument which makes the idea unworkable. Honest debate between opposing views often brings good results.

d. murder of a son and cooking the son for a feast

procne murdered her son and served him to tereus, her husband and her son's father. she did this out of revenge. tereus raped her sister, philomela, and cut her tongue out to keep her from talking. philomela managed to communicate it to procne and procne sought revenge.

tantalus murdered his son and fed him to the gods because he was angry with the gods. the gods punished him by putting him in a pool of water that evaporates when he tries to drink and having fruit hang just out of his reach.

even though there may be variations in human emotions over time, the poem “ a contribution to statistics” by wislawa symborska suggests that the only unchangeable characteristic is mortality.

the author poses a distinction between the approximate and non-approximate numbers which correspond to our need for certainty in life and the difficulty of achieving it. our efforts to measure the exact often fail because the world is not always clearly structured .the poem seems to imply   that the only thing that is certain and has an exact number is death.