subject
English, 05.10.2019 21:00 asjessehills2000

In an argument about random drug testing for students, your opponent argues that schools should respect a student's privacy and not randomly test for drugs. which statement would best refute this argument? we must protect our teenagers and current methods of cutting off drugs at the source are not working. discouraging drug use among athletes will discourage it among the rest of the student body. urine, hair, and breath samples can be used to test for the use of many common drugs. to enforce random drug testing is to view students as guilty until proven innocent, going against our constitutional rights.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:00
Central ideas are the most ideas in a text.
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 20:00
How does it change your understanding of the laws to read them as a primary source rather than just a summary of laws?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:10
London includes a quote about john thornton as he is observing hal attempt to motivate the exhausted dogs "it was idle, he knew, to get between a fool and his folly". if the word "idle" is defined as "of no real worth, importance, or significance", what does this statement mean with regard to hal? who is the fool? what is hal's folly? why would john thornton think it of no real worth or useless to intervene?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
The significant structural shift that happens between chapters 21 and 22 is
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In an argument about random drug testing for students, your opponent argues that schools should resp...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.03.2020 23:02
Questions on the website: 13722359